The laboratory provides a direct transition from 3D CAD data to physical execution across CNC machinery, fabrication setups, and mechatronic assembly benches.
The facility operates as a dedicated technical cell consisting of a Mechanician and a Manufacturing Engineer. Active laboratory bandwidth is committed exclusively to a single project until delivery, ensuring undivided technical focus. Outside of client contracts, the facility operates as an independent R&D workshop for the development of proprietary mechanisms and fabrication methodologies.
| Parameter | Specification / Protocol |
|---|---|
| Intake Scope | Fabrication of mechanical components, precision fixtures, mechanisms, and hardware. Scope includes the modification, repair, and rebuild/restoration of assemblies serving as sub-components for industrial machinery, devices, or small machines compatible with the facility's Mechanical Assembly Bay. |
| Project Focus | Execution of components and assemblies to ensure fit and function conform to customer requirements. |
| Volume Capacity | Optimized for single-unit projects and small-batch manufacturing (typically 1–10 pieces per component). This allows for the dedicated laboratory bandwidth required for individual builds, modifications, repair, and rebuild/restoration services. |
| Domain Focus |
The laboratory is focused on the execution of integrated mechanical systems where deterministic geometry and functional reliability are the primary requirements. This process-driven approach is applied consistently across:
|
To prioritize laboratory bandwidth for precision R&D and specialized assembly work, the following project categories are subject to strict intake criteria:
The laboratory operates under a strict "Confidentiality First" protocol for proprietary assets. If your project involves sensitive technical data, proprietary 3D CAD models, or detailed 2D prints, do not transmit these files prior to the execution of a Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (MNDA).
Prospective clients developing proprietary hardware may request the laboratory's standard MNDA or submit their own corporate agreement to the Manufacturing Engineer for review. For open-source, non-proprietary, or public-domain components, an MNDA framework is not required, and files may be submitted directly for evaluation.
Following the execution of an MNDA (where applicable), a 3D CAD model provided in a neutral format (STEP/.stp preferred) serves as the master geometric reference for all laboratory projects. While 3D data is the standard for intake, the laboratory can provide estimates for the generation of master 3D CAD models derived from customer-supplied 2D documentation or developed via the dimensional replication of physical components. All laboratory-generated models are subject to final customer verification and approval prior to the initiation of fabrication.
Project data must be accompanied by 2D documentation provided in PDF format, utilizing one of the following standards:
Prior to initiating fabrication, the laboratory conducts a digital assembly review to ensure thorough familiarization with the mechanical relationships between interacting components. This process facilitates a reliable transition from digital data to physical hardware by correlating 3D geometry with material and manufacturing constraints. Should any discrepancies appear to affect physical integration, they are coordinated with the customer for clarification to ensure the build aligns with functional requirements.
During the programming phase, components are reviewed to identify optimizations—such as refining internal radii for standard cutter profiles or adjusting deep cavities—intended to reduce lead-times and fabrication costs. When an optimization is identified, the laboratory will modify the component CAD file and, where applicable, update the top-level assembly to demonstrate the impact of the **modified feature**. This updated digital data is submitted for customer consideration and formal approval before the fabrication of the revised geometry or its inclusion in the final build.
This process also includes a cross-reference of specified off-the-shelf (OTS) hardware against corresponding CAD models to verify that physical components align with digital envelopes, tool clearances, and fastener engagement requirements.
Interferences or potential fail-points identified during tooling or assembly are addressed through mid-stream adjustments. All changes required for successful functional delivery are coordinated with the customer design team for immediate implementation.
For Proprietary Projects: Do not include sensitive technical data or CAD models in your initial email. Please request an MNDA baseline first.
For Non-Proprietary Projects: Open prints, STEP files, and public-domain specifications may be attached directly to your inquiry.
*Note: All weapon-related hardware is strictly excluded from intake. Medical, aerospace, and automotive projects are accepted for early-stage concept development and experimental R&D only.
Functional Integrity Mandate: Success is defined by the delivery of a functional mechanical assembly. We provide a sanity check during all phases of build and integration to avoid fabricating obvious fail-points.
