Facility Capabilities & Standards

DOCUMENT TYPE:

Operational Profile

CLASSIFICATION:

Mechanical Hardware Services

1.0 Core Operations

The facility operates as a dedicated technical cell consisting of a Mechanician and a Manufacturing Engineer. This two-man team delivers a direct transition from 3D CAD data to physical hardware across CNC machinery, fabrication setups, and mechatronic assembly benches.

To ensure undivided technical focus, operational capacity is committed exclusively to a single project until delivery. Outside of active client contracts, the facility operates as an independent R&D workshop for the development of proprietary mechanisms and fabrication methodologies.

2.0 Operational Specifications

2.1 Scope Exclusions

Unless specifically categorized as experimental, concept-stage, or proof-of-concept development, medical, aerospace, and automotive projects are excluded from standard intake. High-volume production and purely aesthetic fabrication are also outside our operational focus.

To protect IP security, unvetted walk-in requests cannot be accommodated.

3.0 Technical Infrastructure

Design & Simulation

• 3D Mechanical CAD software
• Simulation and analysis tools
• CAD/CAM with 3D surfacing capability

Fabrication & Machining

• CNC Systems
  • CNC machining center
  • CNC turning center
  • Formlabs SLA printing systems
• Manual & Support Equipment
  • Bridgeport milling machine
  • 13" x 40" manual lathe
  • Welding equipment
  • 12" horizontal bandsaw
  • 12' arbor press
  • 20T H-frame press

Mechanical Assembly Bay

• 15' x 30' x 14' clear assembly area

Metrology & Verification

• Grade AA granite surface plate
• Certified gauge blocks
• High-resolution test indicators
• Accuracy threshold: ±0.0002 inches

Mechatronic Integration

• Electrical testing benches
• Soldering stations

4.0 Laboratory Environments

5.0 Project Engagement Protocols

5.1 Confidentiality & IP Protection

If your project involves sensitive technical data, proprietary 3D CAD models, or detailed 2D prints, do not transmit these files prior to the execution of a Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (MNDA).

Our standard MNDA is available for download below. Alternatively, prospective clients may use the portal to upload their own corporate agreement for review.

Files may be uploaded directly for evaluation if an MNDA framework is not required for open-source, non-proprietary, or public-domain components.

5.2 Data Submission Standards

Following the execution of an MNDA (where applicable), a 3D CAD model provided in a neutral format (STEP/.stp preferred) serves as the master geometric reference for all projects. While 3D data is the standard for intake, the facility can provide estimates for the generation of master 3D CAD models derived from customer-supplied 2D documentation or developed via the dimensional replication of physical components. All facility-generated models are subject to final customer verification and approval prior to the initiation of fabrication.

Project data must be accompanied by 2D documentation provided in PDF format, utilizing one of the following standards:

• Fully Detailed Drawings: Complete drawing sets inclusive of Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) to define all features.
• Limited Specification Drawings: Targeted documentation focused on critical data not inherent in the 3D model, such as tapped hole specifications, high-precision tolerances, material callouts, and specialized finish requirements.

5.3 Digital-to-Physical Correlation

Prior to initiating fabrication, a digital assembly review is conducted to ensure thorough familiarization with the design intent and the mechanical relationships between interacting components. This process cross-references 3D geometry with material and manufacturing constraints to ensure a reliable transition from digital data to physical hardware.

Any apparent discrepancies affecting our understanding of how to execute the physical integration are immediately coordinated with the customer for clarification, ensuring the final build aligns with all functional requirements.

5.4 Material Handling

• Client-Provided: Raw materials and off-the-shelf (OTS) components may be drop-shipped directly to the facility for processing, modification, or assembly.
• Laboratory-Procured: Materials and standard hardware sourced on behalf of the project, with separate accountability and invoicing.

5.5 Design Review & Optimization

Component geometry is reviewed primarily to identify high-impact cost or manufacturability drivers—such as matching internal radii to standard cutter profiles or managing deep cavities—where practical adjustments can reduce fabrication costs and lead times.

For complete transparency, any proposed feature modifications are modeled in CAD to clearly demonstrate the updated geometry, allowing the customer to review and provide formal approval prior to fabrication.

Additionally, specified off-the-shelf (OTS) hardware is cross-referenced against corresponding CAD models to verify that physical components align with digital envelopes, tool clearances, and fastener engagement requirements.

5.6 In-Process Design Adjustments

If interferences or potential fail-points are identified during tooling or assembly, they can be addressed through mid-stream adjustments. All changes required for successful functional delivery are coordinated with the customer design team for immediate implementation.

5.7 Technical Intake